Under the ``publish or perish'' commandment the author did not
hesitate to split a single, rather elementary message about some
exact solvability consequences of the deformation (1.1) of
commutator between $x$ and $p$ into a series of four (sic!) shorter
manuscripts. Thus, reading the six-page paper in question (available
also, without Journal reference, via arXiv:1306.0117) could be
accompanied by reading ``Harmonic oscillators in a Snyder geometry''
(arXiv:1306.0116, 7 pages, with the same initial commutator numbered
as (2.1), and with the very very similar claim that ``the
quantization ... can be solved exactly'') and/or by the older MSs
``Snyder Geometry and Quantum Field Theory'' (arXiv:1209.4012, 10
pages, with the same initial commutator numbered as (1.2), etc) or,
finally, the 5 pages of ``Remarks on the harmonic oscillator with a
minimal position uncertainty'' (arXiv:1205.3546, the only MS
self-cited as ref. [3], with the initial Eq. (2.2)).

The other problem with this paper is that the readers are given
virtually no hints about the context and about the current state of
the art. Among nine references provided in the third paper, the A.
Bose's fresh preprint [9] was only followed by the comparatively
obsolete paper [8], dated 1997, and [7], dated 1997, etc. That
number dropped further down to the (basically, subset) of the mere 5
items in the other 3 MSs.

This being said, the climax of the story is still to come: in the
Arko Bose's cited preprint the author stated that ``As I have been
able to prove in a more recent work, the main result of this paper
is wrong. That's why I am withdrawing this paper'' [from arXiv].

Summarizing: up to a truly nice formula (3.2) and its consequences
the paper provides, first of all, another proof of the steadily
decreasing quality of the refereeing process in math. phys.
literature.




MR3114232 (Sent 2014-01-28) Valtancoli, P. Algebraic method for the
harmonic oscillator with a minimal length. J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013),
no. 7, 073509, 6 pp. 81R60